Monday, December 24, 2007

Blood Diamond - An Inconvenient Truth

Movies affect me a lot, but only rarely they motivate me to make some serious, practical, changes in my daily life. 'An Inconvenient Truth' and 'Blood Diamond' are 2 such movies that I recently watched.

If you haven't seen Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth yet, then please make this a priority to watch. This is a serious, responsible movie which will make you think about bringing small changes in your lifestyle that will affect the next generation(s). This is also a great example of how a politician can dedicate so many years of his life to a noble cause (along with a team, of course) and use his power to bring an important issue to common man's attention. I was impressed by Al Gore's scientific understanding, simplistic explanations and illustrations of global warming throughout the movie. I wish there are more people like him who care about our planet and about this world - about us all. And THEN they can win as many noble prizes as they want.

Meanwhile, I am thankful to my husband for buying me Prius. I will not buy an SUV anymore, no matter how much I am in love with Honda CR-V. I am paying attention to lack of recycling in some Indian restaurants (and in my own house), and am trying to reduce the use of water, electricity, paper and plastic....

And I will also minimize wearing diamonds and gold. The movie, Blood Diamond, said in a caption at the end that 'insist on diamonds that are conflict-free'. I don't really know how to find that out and how to be 100% sure because in India (where majority of world's diamonds are cut and polished), diamonds come from all over the world; I mean I doubt that they distinguish where they are from really...so, who knows?

Sometime ago I watched a show on Oprah which was about 'making dreams come true'. And there was a story about a mom from Sierra Leone who was united with her daughter in the U.S. I cannot narrate the story because it was so painful but you can find the gist here: Sierra Leone War Victim Reunited With Mom . I remember crying through this entire story (hey, Oprah was teary too!) and thinking 'how can people be soooo cruel'. And then I saw Blood Diamonds and boy, did it put everything in its perspective!! I could immediately connect the two and it almost felt as if I knew a real person who had been a victim of the civil war that was shown in the movie. And the movie seemed even more real!!!! I am pretty sure I will not buy diamonds specially if I know they are from that region of South Africa. Its just insane - it seems that the price of human lives/sufferings is so much more cheaper than diamonds....makes me sick. Movies like these impact me, profoundly.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Musharraf retires as Pak army chief

Full Article

This was a very interesting BIG news to watch last night. I thought that Mush will never take off his uniform, and I sat glued to the TV to watch the direct telecast of Mush passing the baton to Kayani - they were at a very plain, but beautiful location in Rawalpindi. As I heard his very emotional speech, I started thinking what must be going on in his mind to give up something he did for the past 45 years and loved so much! He was extremely gracious, and a little stiff, when he actually handed over the baton at the ceremony. But may be he was thinking, 'oh well, some day I had to do it, now is the time..' or may be about the next step in his big plan to bring back stability in Pak. May be he was just thinking about his experiences of several years in the army....Whether he was thinking (or not), for sure I believe that he is someone who is extremely passionate about his country - he wants to sincerely take Pak on a path of sustainable growth and success. And puts his country above himself! Thats a rare quality....

Mush stopped Bhutto from taking out a rally and kept her in house arrest recently. I think he did the right thing! Bhutto, apparently, didn't learn anything from the bomb blasts at a big rally earlier that killed 100-200 innocent people/her supporters. I believe Mush stopped from that happening again and may be even saved Bhutto's life...

In hard circumstances like the ones Mush faces, whether its pressures from the US, or from within his country, it sometimes does require a leader just like him to make the right decisions. He is the only one who can ban people like Nawaz Sharif/Bhutto from entering the country, or prevent big rallies that can be potentially dangerous.

Nobody knows how this change will affect Pak or, for that matter, India because Mush, as non-army President, will still be in a very powerful position in Pak. In the short term though emergency in Pak will be lifted very soon. And we will also see Mush in plain clothes. May be he will have dozens of white shirts in his wardrobe now :)...

Sanjay Dutt , 16 others get bail

Full Article.

Here I go again, ranting about Sanjay D. He was granted bail by the Supreme Court yesterday and is free. Again. I am pretty sure he has a friend in SC who grants his bail every time he appeals there. The only thing he needs to do now is report to CBI every month or so, but obviously, he can now party as before.

On one hand, I feel this is big relief for his friends and family, and I understand their agonizing pain for the last several years. But what a loss for law and order on the whole! I mean, again, nowhere have I seen the full analysis/report/reasoning/basis for him being in and out of the jail for the last 15 years or so. It is still unclear how this case has developed and whether right now he is out temporarily or permanently. But his lawyers repeatedly say that the arm(s) he possessed were for self-protection. Well, then why was he sentenced for 6 years by TADA where it took the lawyers ~15 years to study the (bomb blast) case and for the court to give verdict? And the biggest disappointment is that, as expected, 16 other accused have been granted bail as well. Yikes.

The only thing I wish at this point is that may be the verdict should have come sooner. May be the sentencing was of shorter duration. May be the law could be interpreted and applied in different ways depending on various factors. May be someone could explain me this whole thing from the beginning. I just feel that the public, i.e. I, have been deceived and deprived of information that they deserve to have...

Friday, November 2, 2007

Waiting for John's Goal

I now believe that John Abraham is the best (looking) hindi movie male actors of ALL times. And he also knows how to act. Of all the movies I have seen of him, I have never seen him slip - he always gives a very good performance, romantic (jism) or otherwise (taxi no. 9 2 11). Here is his filmography:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1303433/

Pay attention to John's dance moves in this beautiful song from Goal, see below. Even though the singer's voice doesn't suit him perfectly, he looks very good in his new hair style. I cannot wait to watch this film:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_ghF7q1nA

Oh, and he is soooo beyond the Khans! Although Saif is good and a serious actor, he is not as good (looking) as John. Forget about Shah Rukh, Aamir and Salmaan. Salmaan is horrible in his interviews - he never knows how to answer any question. And Shah Rukh only wants people to say, 'Shah Rukh is the best'. Very irritating.

John is also an MBA - whoa! He clearly rules. Now that he has matured a bit, he is starting to openly talk about social issues, like active smoking and also politics. I hope that he gets more involved in other issues like education, communalism (and may be takes charge of one he feels strongly about) because I think popular people like him can be so influential!

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Transformers and Lal Salaam

I watched these 2 drastically different movies recently, Transformers (English, 2007) and Lal Salaam (Hindi, 2002). I don't want to reveal the plots but just want to summarize what I thought.

Transformers started out really well - I enjoyed the first 45 min like anything. But then it dragged on a bit and came down to just the robots fighting each other, with metal pieces flying all over, which is where I somewhat lost interest. There are instances in the movie that are really funny. Like the dialogues of the car dealer who sells bumblebee to Sam '..then we are practically family..' etc. and the constant mention of ebay and paypal throughout the movie were just hilarious. And not to mention the really annoying parents of Sam - I liked his father's character though. On the other hand I was surprised to see that there were obvious details totally missing in an 'english movie' direction. For eg, these huge robots are outside Sam's house and his parents don't know about it and neither do the neighbours! I mean this was worst than the worst of scenes in hindi movies (this goes straight to hindi movie critics he he). Also, the robots switched from alien speaking to english speaking and vice versa whenever convenient. It was just odd. Overall, the movie is ok if you like robots and action but fails to retain any interest specially in the end.

If you want to watch a good yet emotionally charged movie, don't miss Lal Salaam. This is a very well made movie. And whoa, the story is powerful, good direction, makes you think, a little depressing, and consists of good actors. I am always impressed by these lesser known movies that are actually so much fun to watch. An eg. is 'Us paar'. That one has to be one of my favorites - despite poor production quality its simply outstanding! Or the Japanese movie, 'After Life', really good one. There are so many like that, eg Delhiites, Flavors, Rahna hai tere dil main, Prateeksha, among recent ones - I think its time I compiled a list!

In and Out of Jail Sanjay D

Sanjay Dutt is back in jail.

Full Article

What does that mean? Nothing. He may be out of jail to spend Diwali at home. He may apply for bail in Supreme court again, and will that bail be forever or interim? Who knows? I don't really understand all matters and facts of this case but seeing him in and out of jain for the past several years is kind of irritating. I am pretty sure, they use this dhara and that dhara of the law (and the lawyers and judges) to get out but there is something that keeps pushing him back in jail. Why has he been given so many liberties? Are others that are accused also in and out? If yes, then thats enough time for them to give and take orders from the 'higher ups' in their gang....this is bad. They should either be totally in or totally out.

With due respect to law that protects us citizens everywhere in the world, I have to say that it is not uniform, and at times unfair. In Sanjay Dutt's case, for eg, if it has been proved that the rifle he possessed was not related to the blasts then he should perhaps be given a less severe punishment - 2 yrs instead of 6 or something like that. In the US, for eg, if someone is caught with drugs or another drug-related minor offense, they are sent straight for 25 yrs in jail. That is a bit too much - you take the whole life of a person away. It does'nt make any sense.

Meanwhile, Sanjay D (and his team) does a good job of staying in limelight and getting public sympathy. He will probably continue to be in and out until he is finally out (not in), which will be sad. And because he is doing it, a lot of the other more seriously accused, like the Memon family and others will be doing the same thing. And that will be really disastrous.

The job of nabbing terrorists and those involved in Mumbai ('06), Hyderabad, Ajmer blasts must be a BIG one - partly because the laws are not that straightforward. Those people are the 'real threats' to the country in my opinion and should be caught and punished severely. Of course, by being consistently behind Sanjay D and other popular figures (Salman, Aamir etc.) it does send a strong message to the public that everybody should respect the LAW.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Abhi to Main Jawaan Hoon and stuff

There is a program on TV Asia that I used to watch and like, 'Abhi to Main Jawan Hoon', presenter is Shiraz Sharif (I think).

TV Asia Program

Its a program that plays only very old black and white (melodious) hindi movie songs. Thats good, because we like to watch and enjoy the oldies too. However, the reason I stopped watching this program is that Shiraz sahab wouldn't stop criticizing new music, and always rates old music very highly while putting down the new generation songs. I totally disagree with him, and I don't understand what the point of his program is. Is it to revive old memories or try to convince everyone how terrible the new music is? He brings in interviewees (celebrities from past) and asks, whats the difference between old and new music? And then says repeatedly 'ab woh baat kahan'. sigh sigh.

Of course, music is different now - but its not bad by any means. Whats wrong with today's music? There are some excellent songs nowadays that, honestly, make the oldies seem a bit boring at times. Thats what I think! There is still good poetry, good use of old and new instruments, better production quality and the scope is so much wider, as it includes non-filmi music too.

There was an interview with Javed Akhtar in the same program and I thought Javed A put everything in perspective. Mr Sharif, of course, asked the same question that he often asks, you know difference between old and new shayari.... So Javed A said (not exact words), 'every era makes good and bad music. Its just we only remember the good music from the past so we think that the previous era was better. In old days too there were poor singers, music composers, but nobody remembers THOSE tatpunjeys. Today also there are many good people writing good poetry, and making good music....' I think thats true. And Javed A must be one of them he he.

Also, there are so many legendary music maestros of the old era, like Ustad Amjad Ali Khan, Shiv Kumar Shankar, Pandid Jasraj, Jagjit Singh, who still routinely contribute to contemporary music while keeping their solid and rich classical heritage. So many of them come as special guests/judges at Indian Idol, Sa re ga ma pa TV reality shows. And they can teach the youngsters sooo much! This works great both ways.

Oh, I wanted to mention this too on the side - some of the sa re ga ma pa challenge finalists went to wish Lata Mangeshkar on her b'day at her house. Couple of them sang for her. And she asked, 'can you sing something of your own? It is not wise to just copy other singers - when you are able to sing a composition of your own, then THAT will mean you are a great singer'. Well said, Lata di. Gotta love her!

Getting back to Mr. Sharif - please don't criticize new music anymore. It really hurts. Look at this song and tell me its bad poetry, bad music, haan?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KONhYK391pk&mode=related&search=

Cricket again - Loosing to Aus again

So we have lost a few 50-50 matches against Aus. So what? Big deal. Its just a sport - we need to have a balanced view here. I mean, I really won't totally blame the players though. I think its the BCCI or whoever has control over team selection. Look at Dravid - I don't think he wants to play cricket anymore. And Ganguly, Tendulkar - they should gracefully resign. NOW!

I think that Sharad Pawar and other politicians in BCCI should pay more attention to law and order in Bombay/Maharashtra rather than spending all their time in cricket. They should also focus their energy on nabbing the D company members and the terrorists. They are a disgrace!

I hope that Kapil's ICL comes into action soon. And we have a breed of players that can function like robots from another planet (like Aussies) he he, who are productive no matter what. Seriously, they should think and develop long-term strategy and not just for 1-2 matches, even if that means that in short term we only lose matches.

2 TV programs - old review

I thought I will narrate 2 recent programs that I watched on tv - 'out of the box' and 'damkegi delhi'. I saw both of them on Headlines Today news channel. Did you know that Aaj Tak (hindi) and Headlines Today (eng) are both owned/run by the India Today group? I just found out.

Anyhow, so 'out of the box' was a 30min program on IIM Ahmedabad students. And how going to IIMs is not about getting fat pay package from MNCs any more but about 'realizing their dreams and going their own way'. Fresh graduates are rejecting big offers from big companies (upto 1 crore per year package), and doing their own business, such as, catering, music, setting up schools/organizations, making business plans and presenting to govt etc. One of the IIM A graduates, opened a catering business at his own school - he cooks and prepares food for IIM students in their canteen because he realised that the earlier service was not adequate. Right now he is only serving south indian but will soon add gujrati snacks, and chinese and other cuisine as well.

Then there was another graduate who is recording his own album (he found the entire process of interviewing with MNCs boring :). Two recent graduates have opened a website for indian movie reviews and is thinking of schemes that will generate revenue for them. The site is:

http://www.infica.com/main.php.

They divide movies into 'Mist See', 'Should See', 'Time Pass', and 'Avoid'. I think its a great idea - Bobs may be you can contribute and make YOUR dreams come true :).

Another pass out from 1980s opened a blind school which is now the biggest organisation for Blind in India, and other countries including China are now using the same model. This guy also turned down big offers from big companies (of that time). BTW, naukri.com also is a IIM A start-up! I did not know that.

What great stories and so inspiring!! I wish I had taped this program - though I did write to the contact person of Headline News congratulating him on this great program. It included interviews from all of these guys who have set these great examples, and also of the Placing Head of IIMA. This placing officer (also a former IIMA graduate). was also VERY impressive. He was asked 'some graduates work for only 1-2 years in an MNC, and then leave to start their own business, arent they a hinderance to graduates who DO want that fat pay package?'. His response was 'i dont think we should look at it this way - the graduates that are starting their own business are creating jobs for so many others, jobs that dont otherwise exist. If one student provides job even to 10 others, I will be a happy camper'. Good answer, Mr.!

I now look at MBAs from a whole different angle - no, I am not going to do an MBA :).

So, the other program was 'damkegi delhi'. This was about the new model for delhi, which was unveiled (and work begun) to create 40 new flyovers, new roads, green areas, and a neat ultramodern bridge (which is so far only in 4-5 select metros of the world) with water sports on either side of the bridge. This bridge will be the new landmark of Delhi and will be taller than Qutub. This is in the area of Nazirabad (?) which is clogged with traffic - so it will be a big relief to commuters there. This is all part of the new face of delhi which is planned to complete in 2007. Imagine, it took them 2-3 years to come up with this plan (with German help), and now only 3 years to complete for the commonwealth games in 2010. What an ambitous and challenging task! They are also planning to privatise public transport (bye bye DTC buses- phew!) and improve roads, have more trains etc. Good strategy - attack the problem from all sides!

I love stories like these. Dont you? On the other hand, there are stories of lack of law and order in UP, and of shameful match-fixing. Alas...

Did you hear that recently Queen Mary, the biggest cruise ship, passed through SF? It caused traffic jams because everybody wanted to take a look at the ship. This ship, apparantely, has the most efficient waste drainage system - they dump almost all of their waste in the sea! Yikes, I don't think I want to ever go on a cruise again :(. I like what Anousheh Ansari, said in Oprah show, 'all politicians and leaders should go up in space - they will realise that earth is the only home we have in this big vast universe and that we dont take good care of it'.... So true.

Monday, September 24, 2007

20/20 WC matches - is this The End of Aussie dominance?

The last 2 India matches, vs Aus and Pak, were very exciting. I saw our team play good cricket after a long time. Somehow, when we win everything seems to fall into place - the captaincy, batting, bowling AND team spirit. But when we lose the team's best efforts are not really appreciated. As Sachin T said in his interview (after India won the cup), that people need to have well-rounded thoughts/expectations as well and I think he is right. But did he really mean that we should not have any expectations from the senior/experienced players? Mmmm. Thats definitely something to think about, I guess.

Anyway, I enjoyed the semi-final match against Aus very much. It was amazing to see some brilliant captaincy by Dhoni. And Sreesanth was criticized, by the Aussie media, for his behavior on the field. You know he dances around the person he dismisses (and oh, he is a national champion in break dancing..). Here is a sample of his dance after he hits a six:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3454538612898135067

Sometimes he does get over the top, but this time it was not unprofessional, just aggressive. We have seen enough Pak, Aus players misbehaving on the field (directly towards us), and I believe we (kind of) need that attitude too. Of course, as long as its not unprofessional...The Aussie media also said that "Indians celebrated their win as if they had won the WC". Well, now....it WAS a big win. Were Aussies just feeling bad that they were losing their dominance?

The Pak match was equally thrilling. But I do think that if Misbah had not played the, as my husband puts it, mistimed 'irresponsible' shot, we would have lost. I seriously think we should not make India-Pak matches such a big deal anymore. I think we, the aam junta, should rise above all this and treat India-Pak like any other match. I mean why create the unnecessary tension?

During the analysis of this series on Aaj Tak, Kapil D mentioned that Sachin, Saurav, Laxman, Dravid have all given sooo much to Indian cricket but they couldn't be a part of this joyous occasion. In that regard, I feel that Sehwag and Harbhajan are very lucky. They both have been playing for a long time too but they did get the chance to be part of these winning matches.

The whole day Aaj Tak was airing cricket, cricket, cricket. And no other news! They didn't even mention President Ahmadinejad's visit to the U.S and how he was insulted in Columbia University. That would have been a BIG news, I would think!

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/offbeat/2007/09/25/moos.insulting.iran.cnn


[Remember what Sayed Naqvi said (in one of my earlier posts) about perspective? We get so focused on one thing, one news, that we forget about whats going on in the world. We have to always keep the BIG PICTURE in front of us, and not isolate ourselves so much. No matter what.]

Oh well, the thing thats ridiculous is the amount of money BCCI is showering on this team now. I mean $3 million to the team, a flat for each player, and then some Lakhs of Rs to some individual players. Wow - thats going a little bit overboard, don't you think?

The first thing they need to do is get hold of the costume designer for the team's uniform. I mean who can see the name, number, anything at all, thats light yellow on a light blue jersey? Thats poor design sense. They need to either outline the yellow with black/dark blue or write the letters in dark blue. Look at every other team's shirts - they all have great color combinations! Please, please, jago guys you need that change very badly.

And Dhoni needs to stop saying, "the boys". He needs to be "we, we, we..." all the way.

Overall, Dravid stepping down was a good change. It is an important lesson not just in cricket but also in real life. There should always be changes in life - big or small, you never know they may bring just the kind of luck THIS one brought to our team :).

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Why I posted Anandji interview

I enjoyed this interview (see below) because it was actually informational. Anandji gave intelligent answers that had substance unlike a lot of other interviews which are shallow and full of giggles and/or huge egos specially from the new actors....

Anandji's interview was in 2 parts. And they were both really good. Part 2 is coming soon!

There was another interview of Pyaarelal, which was really good too. Couple others that I liked were of Sukhbir Singh (Ishq tera tarpaawe ) and Sukhwinder Singh (dham dham dharam dharaiya re and chal chahiyya chahiyya).

Sukhbir Singh mostly talked about how he is making a come back after getting married and taking a break of 'few years' :). When he was asked how 'Ishq' happened, he said that the song was recorded in half a day and now its just a blur. He wasn't sure how the song became such a BIG hit.

Sukhwinder talked about a LOT of things. I didn't know that he is a runner! He actually dreamed of competing in the Olympics and used to time his runs. And its apparent - you should see him in a tight black t-shirt - grrrreeeat abs :). He also said that the first song he sang on stage at the age of 7 was 'sa re ga ma pa pa pa pa pa pa ga ma re, ga re mere sang mere sajna'. I'm sure this must have been a tough one for a kid!

I am fascinated by lives of popular people and always wonder what they do besides what makes them popular. Interviews can be an eye opener. Even though they are short, they can sometimes also reveal the personality of the speaker. Anandji, for eg, seemed totally humble yet strong-headed - a good combination for someone to be successful. Sukhbir on the other hand, although wore black goggles, scarf and all that but he seemed somewhat not sure about what he was doing. I think that he is not making full use of his talent....

Interview with Anandji - Part 1

So, I wanted to write about an interview with the music director, Anandji, which I saw on the TV program, View Asia Uncut - with my comments as CV. Although he spoke in somewhat broken English, I found his answers very insightful. Read below as he reveals some of the intricacies of music composing, how music evolved in Hindi cinema etc. Hope you enjoy reading it as much as I enjoyed watching.

Note: song no.s are in italics.

Introduction:
Anandji has spent half a century in the music business. He was first awarded for his music in Samrat Chandra Gupt ( chahe paas ho chahe door ho..). After that there was no looking back. Then he teamed up with his brother Kalyanji for Madari and then Chaliya (chaliya mera naam.. ). The duo produced numerous awards and gave several hits like 'apne aage na peeche, na koi oopar neeche, janaab-e-aali' and ' mere desh ki dharti, sona ugle ugle heere moti'. Recently he was recognized and picked up grammy award for his tune been used by a pop band in the US. 'aye naujawan, hai sab kuch yahan, jo chaahe le le khushi to, tauba na kar abhi to .'. The English version is, 'oh no no no dont break my heart....'.

Q. Anandji, what an honor, you are recognized by the western world!
A. Its a great feeling. Its wonderful that our music has reached to the Grammys but I am surprised that they selected a song that was recorded in 1971. Not sure how they selected this song.
CV: It is remarkable how and where they hear (and borrow music from) old hindi songs. More recently, you can hear a lot of hindi songs ring tones specially on english/european cell phones. I think exchange of music (or anything entertainment) either way is a good thing!

Q. Of all the songs you did in your career, this one didn't really stick out as a hit and they picked this song?
A. May be they were searching for something with Indian touch and with western style also. This one was a cabaret no. For the first time you know in a cabaret no., sitar and tabla was used. They must have liked the original beat used for first time in that song, which is now called the hip-hop. Because it was Firozji this kind of rhythm was agreed to - other producers wont agree to this type of combination. Cabaret means piano + tabla or piano + brass. No one would agree to sitar + piano + tabla.
CV: This song is quite unique - I am surprised it was not a hit. And I had not heard it before! So, really, did hip hop start way back then?

Q. When you went to US, did you meet any hip hop composers?
A. They were very happy I came all the way from India to accept my award.
CV: A clip from Grammy event: The grammy announcer says 'here is one of the unique things going on tonite - congratulations Anandji - his song was sampled twice in this record'. On stage Anandji says, "I am a short guy, my brother was tall, you may be tall, but this award has made ME very tall, thank you very much...:).

Many music composers were there, some hip-hop composers, and they asked how you managed to make this kind of work? When they came to know that I have given music in ~250 films, they were shocked. I said we have lots of music in our films, and 4-5 songs in each film! + background music. Oh so you do background also? I said, yes. There is a lot of background music with action, drama etc. They asked good questions. They asked how do you compose music? on piano? I said I never write or sit on piano. Composition comes from mind (and heart).

oooo neend na mujhko aaye, dil mera khabraaye....

Q: Almost 50 years in the industry, what made you think you wanted to be a music director?
A: Music was my hobby. As a child I was always pushing his brother to try this music and that..thats how it all started. In those days, I didn't speak English because it was pre-independence era. It was motive for us, we were rejecting English. In metric exam, I wrote: hindi hamari matrabhaasha hai, hamain angrezi seekhne ki koi zaroorat nahin hai, dhanyawad. Thats how I passed....

One day, Pandit Jawaharlal was speaking in English on radio. I asked my father, papa, he is speaking in English, and we are not supposed to do that. Papa said, beta, English people must go, the language will stay. Then he showed a rupee note and said see its written in English first and then in other Indian languages. India is a cosmopolitan state. English will be a common factor between us. Then I started learning English. Then I started reading a popular English magazine, where I learned about this new instrument, which is now called a synthesizer. The first one was London made, and we brought that to India. That could play 30-40 instruments/tones. From that synthesizer tone, the naagin tone in 'Man dole' was played!!
CV: Isnt it amazing that at that time Anandji made naagin tone from a synthesizer, and recently, Kailash Kher used a real been for naagin tone in his bam lahiri song here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=693YG9J7Y94

Q. How does one make music? Is it when driving? when?
A: Most people think that if people know a LOT about music, or know classical music, they can be composers. That you need to have a classical base to be creative. No, it is not like that. For composing there is no need to master any instrument - it has to be an inner thing. In old days, Meera, Tulsi, Kabir, wrote and composed with not much knowledge about music nor did they play any instruments.

Q: In those days, most recordings were live. Was it difficult?
A: In the beginning, we used to record 2 songs in 6 hours. Because the songs were short. Camera was not that developed so it was a fixed session. There was much more emphasis on clothes and expressions. Eg: Main ban ki chidiya, ban ban ghoomo re....The whole song is just a couple of lines, and the actor doesn't move much through the entire song.

There was no auto-focus and lighting was not so high, exposure was low in camera. Gradually, when trolley started, camera with zoom etc. came then music became lengthy...

Dulhan chali, pahan chali, teen rang ki choli...

Q: Did director explain to you when trolley, zoom etc. moves etc?
A: We worked with a few directors and knew their styles - some liked long shots, some close-ups, some angles. Then movie songs went outdoors and drew inspiration from american outdoor shootings etc..so it evolved.

O Mere raja, khafa na hona, der se aaye, door se aayi, majboori thi phir bhi maine waada to nibhaya...

Then time came when lots of effect music came - that was another thing - murders, action, somebody jumping from somewhere. We had to think of different sounds for that.

Pyaar zindagi hai, pyaar bandagi hai, yahalla yahalla, oooo, ya alla (lightning sounds).

Q: How do you create all these effets? Is it in your head or need to have a good team for background music etc?
A: Of course, its not one person. Rhythm section, specially in background music, is different. Eg: my younger brother, Baabla, is a drummer. He is a good drummer in west indies - he created and played drums in the chutni music there that was very popular.
CV: Trust me, chutni music was actually VERY popular in Brooklyn. I used to listen to this music on local radio in Brooklyn all the time - I may even have some songs recorded in my tape. I didn't know it was Anandji's brother creating that fun music!!

Ek to kam zindagaani, uspe ye kam hai jawani...

Then there was slight competition between brothers: Kalyandi-Anandji (2 of them) and Baabla! The way it used to happen is that the director comes with a story with some sad songs, some bhajan, or patriotic. We both composed music for it and the director chose which one he liked...

Waado kar le saajna, tere bina main na rahoon, mere bina tu na rahe, hoke juda, yeh waada raha....

After that we wrote songs. We were very much into what was going to be picturised. Suppose, its a dance music then I used to ask, where is it going to be shot? Suppose it is in Simla or Assam, or a plateau region then culture of that region was considered. Then what type of character is singing the song? is it chulbuli or punjabi, assamese? So the kind of music, rhythm would all change.

Na na karte pyaar tumhi se kar baithe....

Q: When you make music or certain songs, do you know this one is going to be a hit?
A: See 90% is a yes that it will be a hit. Because you know you have done enough practice. When we created the song, we used to give to the children of our house to see if they like it or not. They had the freedom to reject. Sometimes they didn't know if it was a situational song but other songs like, mere angane main, pardesiya yeh sach hai piya, they liked them and we knew instantly that these were going to be hit. Others, like mera jeevan kora kagaz, we have created these based on situations.

Mera jeevan kora kagaz, kora hee rah gaya..

When you go into microscopic film making, you have a repo with the director. The director trusts you, you trust the director. You know his work, and also the characters. For eg: Amitji is different, he is serious and opens his mouth wide while singing.

Rote hue aate hain sab, hansta hua jo jaayega, woh mukaddar ka sikandar....

Then its Rajesh Khanna. He closed his lips while singing. Eg: in wada tera wada, he sings the entire song with his mouth pretty much closed. So you have to pay attention to those things also.

Dil ko dekho, chehra na dekho, chehre ne laakhon ko loota, dil saccha aur chehra jhootha...

CUT! CUT!

Friday, September 14, 2007

Rahul Dravid Resigns as Captain

So, Rahul D finally resigned. I am not surprised at all - actually, I am relieved. He should have done this long time ago. He was just not performing as a captain and his game was affected badly. But I'll miss him, specially his statements, 'the boys are doing great', 'the boys tried their best', 'the boys were tired',....:).

We hope that, Rahul, you feel relieved of the 'burden' too and that you can concentrate on your spectacular batting again!

We also hope that Sachin, Saurav, Sehwag and Harbhajan are the next in line to resign. FOREVER!

Thursday, September 13, 2007

The Iraq Report

Did you watch it? I don't know if I should believe it or not. Nor do I have much to say about this report presented by General Petreaus. But the thing about this is that can you really write a report on something so severe, so complex, a report on a war? I mean the colorful charts and numbers are good, but nothing at all seems 'real' about it. Where is the chart showing grief of families of thousands of men, women and children that have been killed and those of soldiers who have sacrificed their lives? Where is the chart showing no. of people who have fled Iraq and migrated to neighboring countries? What conditions/situations are they in right now? A report that doesn't talk about all of this is useless, I think.

Afterall, Gen Petreaus is doing his duty. And here is a clip of his interview:

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2007/01/23/sot.petraeus.iraq.cnn


War/violence (of ANY KIND, ANYWHERE) is senseless, baseless. That is all I have to say.

allah tero naam
ishwar tero naam
sabko sanmati de bhagwan

oh saare jag ke rakhwaale
nirbal ko bal dene waale
balwaanon ko de de gyaan

sabko sanmati de bhagwan

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Pak former PM sent back to exile (and Sayed Naqvi's comments)

Earlier this week, Pak former PM, Nawaz Sharif was sent back to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia by Musharraf. It was quite a dramatic event. Nawaz Sharif had announced long time back that he planned to come back to Pak in an attempt to participate in elections (to restore democracy). His plane landed in Islamabad - he was at the airport for a few hours but was not able to come out of the airport. He was boarded on another plane which was supposed to take him to Karachi, but took him to Jeddah instead. Thousands of supporters of Mr. Sharif were arrested even before he arrived to avoid any problems. Of course, we don't really know the exact sequence of events. But it happened the same day as the 'Iraq report' was being presented by General Petreaus.

The Pak news was shown constantly on Aaj Tak. They interviewed a Pak reporter, Sayed Naqvi, and asked him questions about what exactly was going on at the airport when Sharif's plane landed etc. This was the first time I saw a Pak reporter on TV. Mr. Naqvi seemed somewhat irritated when questioned by Aaj Tak. I don't know if it was because he was just frustrated/disappointed by the dramatic events going on in his country or by the fact that it was being aired on Indian TV. In any case, it was a short interview but a memorable one (for me). I don't remember his exact words. But he said something like this: 'I will answer your questions by asking YOU some questions. The drama thats been created in Pak is to divert your's and our attention from the 'Iraq report'. You should go and see whats in that report rather than airing whats going on in your neighboring country. Just because this is happening in your neighboring country, you are airing it. No other country is showing it - everyone is focused on Iraq right now. I believe in fearless journalism. You should ask, what's America's role in all of this? What do people around Musharraf want? Sharif doesn't have the kind of support Bhutto had - do you know ISI helped Butto to get into Pak? You should always put things in perspective. This has nothing to do with restoring democracy - this is all drama. I tell them to not get distracted by all this and look at whats happening in India, their progress and learn from them...'

He basically went on and on. In the end the Aaj Tak reporter just said 'ok to sum it up can you tell us a sher describing the current situation in Pak'? Well, Mr. Naqvi tells a sher in Urdu which he translates as: 'the situation is like that of a sick man - on one side its God who says I will take you away, and on the other there is the doctor who says I will definitely cure you.'

Couple of things ran into my mind as I was hearing this short yet brilliant interview. Mr. Naqvi said some pretty thought-provoking things. What he said about perspective was right on! Putting things into perspective is very important not just in journalism but also in real life. Whenever we discuss about a specific topic, person, situation we should not lose sight of the big picture. But Mr Naqvi totally didn't practice that because he seemed to not like the fact that it was shown on Aaj Tak. What happens in Pak is immensely important for India (and I am sure vice versa). In general, every country keeps an eye on whats happening in their neighboring country. And they should. In the US, the Iraq report was more important that day so CNN was airing just that the whole day. But they did have a caption running at the bottom about Pak news too! In fact, this news was so big that it was in all major newspapers around the country, including New York Times, Washington Post etc.

I could tell from seeing a brief clip that Mr. Naqvi must be one of the top or at least one of the most experienced reporters in Pak. So when I searched for Syed Naqvi, I found that he was the only reporter to travel with AB Vajpayee on the bus to Lahore! Pretty cool, haan?

The other thing that came to my mind was that the Aaj Tak reporter didn't really have much to say after Mr Naqvi threw so much at him. May be it was that they were running out of time or something, but to listen and analyze what the other person says, and then to follow-up appropriately must be a hard thing for reporters. I believe that most of these news channels are relatively new but definitely this is something the Aaj Tak reporters can improve on. For once, they should always take notes - which I don't see them do a LOT of times. Second, if it isnt, this should be part of their training.